Group 1,2, and 3 Reflections

 Edward Valdes

Group 1


Group number one talked about intercultural communications. The way they presented their project was very understandable and they provided a lot of images, videos, and they explained about their topic very well. Most of the people presenting provided not a lot but enough words for us to understand and that is much better then having a lot of words for no reason and it also made what they are trying to teach us easy to understand. On the other hand some slides had way too many words and they could had made it way shorter and use better vocabulary. The images in the slides provided us to see a visual explanations of what they are teaching us about and it was very good. The videos that were put on the slides were short and straight to the point and that is the best type of videos they could had put. Some other slides provided videos also but some were way too long and explained things that weren't even about the topic and took up a lot of the time they had and some of their group member weren't able to present. Also some of their members didn't show up to present their slide so we weren't able to learn about that topic. Overall the presentation was good but it had some flaws in them.




Group 2

Group number two talked about communicating in groups. This topic is a very key one since a lot of us will need to learn how to communicate in groups so it was important that they explained it well which they did. Their presentation went straight to what they are trying to teach us and they didn't add extra information we didn't need. They didn't have a lot of words on the slides which provided us clear understanding on the topic and it gave the rest of the members in the group time to present. But some of the members were reading strictly off the slide and didn't have nothing to say off the top of their head that was important and may have given us more information. Some slides had very little images and videos and just words. The videos that were provided in the slides gave a lot of information and were very helpful understanding this topic.  On the other hand some of the videos were too long and took up a lot of the time. Overall they provided clear information on their topic and was a good prestation.



Group 3


Group number three talked about leadership and problem solving. This is my group and I honestly think we did a good job. Our group members provided not that much but enough words so the viewers are able to understand the topic without that many words. They also provided key pictures to make the topic easier to understand. But there were some pictures on the slides that could had been left out so it wouldn't distract the viewer from what they are tryin to learn. The videos that were on the slide were short and straight to the point and had enough information to inform the audience. Some of the slides also had very good vocabulary but some slides had simple words which is good and bad at the same time because the words are easy to understand but it makes it less professional. It also seem liked some of the people in the groups were reading off the slide and didn't give enough information about their topics. Overall it was a good presentation were they provided short and straight to the point information that provided the viewers the ability to understand the topic very easily.






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SPC Group presentation blog post - Alfred Vizcaino

SPC Project 2 Review - Anthony Menendez

Big Theme Project Reflection